Marcus Schoeman vs Elijah Dikkenberg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Aug at 05:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Schoeman vs E. Dikkenberg

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schoeman 1 - 0 Dikkenberg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marcus Schoeman winning 2 and Elijah Dikkenberg winning 0. The last match between Marcus Schoeman and Elijah Dikkenberg was at the M15 Brisbane, 10-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Marcus Schoeman getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schoeman | 1 |
| Dikkenberg | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M15 Brisbane(08-10-25)
M. Schoeman vs E. Dikkenberg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.44% (4-5) | Career Total W/L | 42.11% (8-11) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Schoeman vs E. Dikkenberg Match Preview:
- Schoeman has recently shown a strong advantage in second serve performance, securing 46.43% of points, while Dikkenberg managed none. What does this imply? Typically, better second serve success corresponds to overall match success.
- On return games, Schoeman has intercepted 57.89% of second serves from opponents, contrasting sharply with Dikkenberg's 0% return rate. This potentially indicates a clear upper hand for Schoeman in breaking serves.
- Regarding first serve returns, Schoeman's effectiveness is 25.64%, whereas Dikkenberg still remains at 0%, reinforcing a probable edge for Schoeman.
- Analyzing performance under pressure, Schoeman has a 50% breakpoint save record, with Dikkenberg again at 0%, suggesting Schoeman may handle pivotal moments better in matches.
- In terms of match wins over the last year, Schoeman stands at 66.67%, significantly outpacing Dikkenberg who has a 33.33% win rate.
- Busting myths about surface preferences, Schoeman's best surface win rate of 43% is on Hard courts, a surface on which Dikkenberg struggles with a 20% win rate.
- Both players predominantly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuits, with Schoeman recording more wins (66.67%) than Dikkenberg (33.33%) over the same period.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, both players maintain a perfect 100% win rate, suggesting a potential thrilling endgame showdown.
- Schoeman exhibits stronger breakpoint conversion at 42.86%, unlike Dikkenberg who hasn’t converted any, lending Schoeman an in-match advantage when such opportunities arise.
Editorial Prediction (August 10, 2025, UTC):
Current form analysis indicates Schoeman holds distinct advantages over Dikkenberg in various aspects crucial to match outcomes, particularly in second serve performance and return game superiority.
Schoeman's ability to manage high-stakes situations, like saving breakpoints and capitalizing on opponents' weaknesses, could be decisive.
Performance data suggests Schoeman is more adept overall, particularly on the hard court surface they will likely contest. Therefore, taking into account all performance metrics, Schoeman is predicted to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Marcus Schoeman vs Elijah Dikkenberg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Schoeman vs E. Dikkenberg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Schoeman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 2-6 6-3 10-8 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(1) 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | ||
E. Dikkenberg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(2) 6-2 | ||

M. Schoeman vs E. Dikkenberg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.44% (4/5) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 45.00% (9/11) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.00% (16/24) |
| 48.86% (107/112) | Games Win/Loss | 45.53% (168/201) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 2 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 99.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 86.42 |
| 57% (37/65) | 1st Serve % | 67% (35/52) |
| 51% (19/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (23/35) |
| 46% (13/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 42% (32/77) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/50) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Futures W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 44% (4/9) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (7/7) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (7/0) |
| 20% (5/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (12/1) |